Skip to main content
onext technology
DevOps 8 min September 23, 2025

DevSecOps: security integrated from the start of the development cycle

How to go from quarterly releases to daily ones without compromising security

E

Equipo onext

Especialistas Cloud & DevOps

Team working on DevSecOps security

Security can no longer be a phase at the end of the development cycle. DevSecOps integrates security practices from day one, letting organizations dramatically increase their deployment frequency while improving their security posture.

The problem: security as a bottleneck

For decades, security has been treated as a final inspection before release. The result: slow development cycles, vulnerabilities discovered late (when they're most expensive to fix), and security teams overwhelmed reviewing hundreds of tickets before every release.

This traditional model creates three critical problems:

  • Continuous friction: Developers wait weeks for security approvals, losing momentum and context
  • Expensive remediation: Vulnerabilities discovered in production cost 30x more than if they're caught in development
  • A culture of silos: Development and security teams work as adversaries instead of collaborators

The promise of DevSecOps: speed AND security

DevSecOps breaks this paradigm by integrating security into every phase of the software lifecycle. Organizations that implement it correctly achieve transformative results:

Proven results

RELEASE FREQUENCY

Quarterly → Daily

Go from quarterly releases to multiple daily deployments without compromising security

REMEDIATION TIME

Weeks → Hours

Cut the average vulnerability remediation time from weeks or months to hours

EARLY DETECTION

85% Pre-Production

Detect and fix vulnerabilities before they reach production

REMEDIATION COST

-75% Savings

A drastic reduction in the cost of fixing vulnerabilities by catching them early

The 4 key transformations of DevSecOps

Drawing on frameworks from leading consultancies like McKinsey and Accenture, we identify four fundamental shifts organizations must make to adopt DevSecOps successfully:

1. Integrated operating model: break the silos

The first change is organizational. Instead of separate development, operations and security teams, DevSecOps requires integrated, multidisciplinary teams where everyone is responsible for security.

In practice:

  • Cross-functional teams: Full-stack developers with basic security skills
  • Security Champions: Developers with additional security training who act as ambassadors on their teams
  • Embedded security: Security specialists working inside product teams (not as a separate gate)

2. "Consumable" secure services: architecture by design

Instead of reviewing every service individually, build a library of pre-approved components that teams can consume with confidence.

Secure components

  • • Hardened base containers
  • • Authentication/authorization libraries
  • • Database connectors with encryption
  • • APIs with rate limiting and validation

Benefits

  • ✓ Faster development (reuse)
  • ✓ Consistent security (no reinventing)
  • ✓ Smaller attack surface
  • ✓ Centralized updates

3. Full automation: security testing in CI/CD

Automation is the heart of DevSecOps. Every commit must pass through multiple layers of automated security analysis before reaching production.

Automated DevSecOps pipeline

1
SAST (Static Application Security Testing)

Static code analysis looking for known vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, hardcoded secrets)

2
SCA (Software Composition Analysis)

Scanning third-party dependencies and libraries to identify known CVEs

3
Container Scanning

Analysis of Docker images looking for vulnerabilities in the operating system and packages

4
IaC Security Scanning

Validation of Terraform, CloudFormation and Kubernetes manifests for insecure configurations

5
DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

Automated penetration testing in a staging environment before production

4. Evolved architecture: designed for security

DevSecOps influences architecture decisions from day one. Successful organizations design systems that are secure by default:

  • Microservices with zero-trust authentication: Every service validates identity, assuming no internal trust
  • Centralized secrets management: Vault, AWS Secrets Manager instead of environment variables
  • Immutability: Immutable containers that get replaced, not patched
  • Deep observability: Security logs, metrics and traces in real time

Success stories: DevSecOps in production

Fintech: from 4 releases/year to 20/day

A European payments platform implemented full DevSecOps in 8 months. They automated SAST, SCA and container scanning in their GitHub Actions pipeline, integrated Snyk for dependency analysis, and adopted a zero-trust architecture with Istio.

Results: They increased from 4 releases a year to 15-20 daily deployments. 92% of vulnerabilities are detected pre-commit or in staging. Remediation time dropped from 21 days to 4 hours on average.

B2B SaaS: SOC 2 certification in record time

An analytics startup needed SOC 2 Type II to close enterprise clients. They implemented DevSecOps from scratch: security policy as code, continuous infrastructure auditing with Prowler, and automated compliance controls.

Results: They obtained SOC 2 in 6 months (vs the typical 12-18). Zero critical findings in the audit. 100% of their infrastructure is versioned and audited in Git.

Common mistakes when implementing DevSecOps

Antipatterns to avoid

  • ❌ "Shift-left" without training: Handing security responsibility to developers without upskilling them creates frustration and vulnerabilities
  • ❌ Tools without process: Buying Snyk or SonarQube isn't DevSecOps. Without a triage and remediation process, you only generate noise
  • ❌ Absolute blockers: Failing the build on any low-severity finding paralyzes teams. Use severity-based policies
  • ❌ Security as an external gate: If the security team is still a separate checkpoint, you haven't changed anything
  • ❌ Ignoring culture: DevSecOps is 60% culture, 30% process, 10% tools. Reversing the order guarantees failure

Implementation roadmap: where to start

Month 1-2

Foundations and culture

  • • Basic security training for the whole development team
  • • Identify Security Champions (volunteers, not imposed)
  • • Initial audit: dependency inventory, attack-surface analysis
  • • Define severity policies (what blocks the pipeline, what's a warning)
Month 3-4

Basic automation

  • • Integrate SAST (SonarQube, Semgrep) into CI/CD
  • • Add SCA (Snyk, Dependabot) for dependency scanning
  • • Container scanning (Trivy, Aqua) in the build pipeline
  • • Secrets scanning (GitGuardian, TruffleHog) pre-commit
Month 5-6

Secure architecture

  • • Implement secrets management (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager)
  • • IaC security scanning (Checkov, tfsec) for Terraform/CloudFormation
  • • Build a library of reusable secure components
  • • Set up security observability (basic SIEM, alerts)
Month 7+

Maturity and optimization

  • • DAST (ZAP, Burp Suite) automated in staging
  • • Runtime security (Falco, Aqua) in production
  • • Threat modeling during the design phase of new features
  • • Metrics: vulnerability MTTR, % pre-prod detection, security debt

The critical role of a DevSecOps CoE

Implementing DevSecOps at scale takes more than tools. Successful organizations establish a DevSecOps Center of Excellence that:

  • Defines and maintains the golden path (an approved pipeline with all validations)
  • Creates and updates the library of secure components
  • Continuously trains teams (threat modeling, secure coding)
  • Manages the centralized tooling (licenses, configurations, integrations)
  • Acts as internal consultants for security architecture

Without a CoE, every team implements DevSecOps differently, creating inconsistencies, duplicated effort and security gaps.

Conclusion: security as an accelerator, not a brake

DevSecOps inverts the traditional relationship between security and speed. Instead of a trade-off, they become allies: more security enables more speed by reducing incidents, rework and last-minute emergencies.

Organizations that adopt DevSecOps correctly don't just deploy faster and with more confidence. They build a culture where security is a shared responsibility, not "the security team's" problem. And in a world where vulnerabilities are exploited within hours, that capability is a critical competitive advantage.

Want to implement DevSecOps without stopping your deliveries?

At onext we've helped startups and scaleups integrate security into their pipelines without sacrificing speed. Our on-demand DevSecOps CoE accompanies you from the initial audit to the full implementation of the golden path.

See DevSecOps CoE
Written by
Equipo onext
onext technical team

Written by the technical team at onext, a Spanish applied-AI consultancy. It reflects the team's practice in transforming development teams, cloud, DevSecOps and quality: 12 teams transformed and 0 sprints lost.

Related articles

IA 11 min

AI for public tenders: buy the tool or build the capability?

Spain's public sector tendered 204 contracts with AI at their core in the last full year on record, and more than half of all tenders score quality above price: the quality of your proposals is a revenue lever, not paperwork. Almost every offering on the market solves it the same way — Gober, LICAI, TendersTool, AIverso and the rest sell access to a capability that lives outside your company. This piece is not a tool comparison. It separates the three layers of the real work (finding, retrieving and adapting your own material, deciding what to commit to), gives the three questions that settle the decision, a table to take to your committee, the exit cost that never appears in the budget, the cases where buying is the right answer, and the four assets that stay in-house when you choose to build.

Read more
IA 10 min

Automating insurance claims with AI: what applies on 2 August and what was postponed to 2027

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and has been in force since the 27th: the obligations for Annex III high-risk systems are postponed to 2 December 2027, and those for Annex I to 2 August 2028. But the transparency duties of Article 50 were not postponed and apply from 2 August 2026 —with the marking of synthetic content enforceable from December for generative systems already on the market—, so if an assistant opens the claim or drafts the communication to the policyholder, that affects you now. This piece breaks down the six phases of a claim and where AI fits without risk, the delimitation of Annex III 5(c) (pricing in life and health, not claims handling; non-life outside), the three reasons claims pilots never reach production —inaccessible policy wordings, zero traceability, the human in the wrong place— and a seven-step path to start with one narrow claim type with your context in order.

Read more